greg_slo
Well-known member
so i believe the THX certification crescendo is one of the greatest (short term) audio experiences for any HT...however im not so sure if i agree with the THX philosophy...
i browsed and searched previous posts to try and find a similar thread, but didnt find anything specific to what im thinking about (and have been thinking for quite some time) so i really hope im not re-posting this question(s).
my original thoughts of THX were: 'i love it'...this was probably just a cool factor/marketing thing. after i started really getting into to hi-fi, i thought 'why should this THX dictate what cut-off/cross over freq. should be used?' (not that the mandated 80 hz and below was a bad choice to go automatically go to the sub(s)...and it is often a great stand by when setting up low key or quick HT demos)....and with a full range speaker like the MLs, this cut off point might not be the best...besides the LFE does not even get sent the mains when no cut off freq is set...but now the newer certifications allow much more flexibility when dialling in and callibrating a system...so im not entirely sure what i want to think aout THX...
also, i was kinda surprised to read in an interview (in "the perfect vision") with Tomlinson Holman (the main guy behind THX), that good video is more influencial than good audio overall in a theater...this was my impression, anyway, of the last Q/A from that article...oh, this article is in the march 2007 issue pg 48-50.
i just was curious as to what people thought on this/these topics...and personaly, i think good sounds is vastly more important than good video...i can watch a movie on a massive TV...but the speakers on a TV almost ruin things for me; where as my 15 year 27" proton isnt as big a deal with my current spkrs and accompaning gear...movies still kick butt:rocker:
...just some thoughts...
~greg
i browsed and searched previous posts to try and find a similar thread, but didnt find anything specific to what im thinking about (and have been thinking for quite some time) so i really hope im not re-posting this question(s).
my original thoughts of THX were: 'i love it'...this was probably just a cool factor/marketing thing. after i started really getting into to hi-fi, i thought 'why should this THX dictate what cut-off/cross over freq. should be used?' (not that the mandated 80 hz and below was a bad choice to go automatically go to the sub(s)...and it is often a great stand by when setting up low key or quick HT demos)....and with a full range speaker like the MLs, this cut off point might not be the best...besides the LFE does not even get sent the mains when no cut off freq is set...but now the newer certifications allow much more flexibility when dialling in and callibrating a system...so im not entirely sure what i want to think aout THX...
also, i was kinda surprised to read in an interview (in "the perfect vision") with Tomlinson Holman (the main guy behind THX), that good video is more influencial than good audio overall in a theater...this was my impression, anyway, of the last Q/A from that article...oh, this article is in the march 2007 issue pg 48-50.
i just was curious as to what people thought on this/these topics...and personaly, i think good sounds is vastly more important than good video...i can watch a movie on a massive TV...but the speakers on a TV almost ruin things for me; where as my 15 year 27" proton isnt as big a deal with my current spkrs and accompaning gear...movies still kick butt:rocker:
...just some thoughts...
~greg