Gordon Gray
Well-known member
So here's what I understand at its most basic level.
TM goes to a store and buys some skittles and a beverage.
He's walking back home when GZ sees him and believes TM is up to "no good".
GZ calls the police. The police tell him not to engage TM. GZ says "these punks always get away with it".
He does not take their advice and confronts TM. TM did not initiate the encounter.
An altercation occurs and TM is killed by GZ.
If GZ had not confronted TM, against the advice of the police, TM would likely still be alive.
GZ claims his life was in danger, after he deliberately initiates the conflict, and is found innocent.
Is there something very wrong with this picture?
GG
TM goes to a store and buys some skittles and a beverage.
He's walking back home when GZ sees him and believes TM is up to "no good".
GZ calls the police. The police tell him not to engage TM. GZ says "these punks always get away with it".
He does not take their advice and confronts TM. TM did not initiate the encounter.
An altercation occurs and TM is killed by GZ.
If GZ had not confronted TM, against the advice of the police, TM would likely still be alive.
GZ claims his life was in danger, after he deliberately initiates the conflict, and is found innocent.
Is there something very wrong with this picture?
GG