Quantcast

Poll- 2 Channel Audio vs. Home Theater

MartinLogan Owners (MLO)

Help Support MartinLogan Owners (MLO):

Percent time you listen to Two Channel Audio vs. Home Theater use


  • Total voters
    133

sleepysurf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
2,515
Reaction score
9
Location
Tampa, FL
Just curious what percentage of the time everybody listens to 2-Channel Audio, vs. Home Theater
 

Kaliar

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
Location
Québec, Canada
Well, I replied with "90-100% Two Channel Audio" but the reality is different.

My real answer is: 100% Two Channel Audio ! ;)

Regards,
 

Robin

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
3,292
Reaction score
0
Location
Calistoga, California
I listen to 2 channel music, 10 - 20%. Home Theater, 80 - 90%...

I was in, 'The Good Guys' store, in my area, and noticed they only carried, DTS (surround) - CD's. I only have, one DTS (surround) - CD, Queen's, "A Night At The Opra". I found it interesting that since purchasing, that one DTS - CD, the music industry has produced a much larger selection of, DTS (surround) - CD's. Naturally, DTS (surround) - CD's only play on, DTS decoder equiped, CD players.

-Robin
 

patlad

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto - ON
Kaliar said:
Well, I replied with "90-100% Two Channel Audio" but the reality is different.

My real answer is: 100% Two Channel Audio ! ;)

Regards,
Same for me! 100% two channel audio.
 

SugarMedia

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
733
Reaction score
0
Location
EU
I have always been a die-hard two channel guy. In the future, I'm sure that will change.
 

Joey_V

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
0
Location
Dallas, TX
Considering I only have 2 speakers (and a sub), I dont have a choice but to listen in 2 channel - even for movies.

I did have a full setup, but I figured that in my present situation with school and all... I didnt have time to watch but 3 dvd movies all of last schoolyear. So I decided to lighten up the speaker load and go 2 channel.

:)
 

Robin

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
3,292
Reaction score
0
Location
Calistoga, California
I want the best of both worlds...

Thanks to the wonderful input of Mark, Jeff, SugarMedia and other friends here at this most excellent place..., I am now, of the mind, to try to acquire the gear/equipment, in order to have two systems in one... I really desire, to not only have a really great sounding ML HT, as well as and a truly wonderful sounding "tubed", musicial, two channel listening ML system too... ;)

I know..., it is going to be ultimately, much more expensive, but I think, in the long term, my ML system will be a that much more versatile and appealing. :)

Cheers

-Robin
 
Last edited:

pat17

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Location
La Rochelle (France)
More than 50% of multichannel, which doesn't necessarily means HT - I'm listening quite a lot to SACDs... :)
 

Tj Bassi

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
346
Reaction score
0
Multi 100%, but we did not intend to go that route. Our Requests are tucked into the corners of an 11x22 foot room, so the two-channel soundstage has never opened up as well as it could given more space. I'm not usually a fan of all of those fancy surround modes on some of the newer processors (stuff like hall, theater, movie,etc) but I found the CircleSurround music mode on my Marantz processor quite enjoyable. Its interesting that in this mode the center and surround channels do not overtake the main L/R speakers, it just seems to help them breathe.
Its one of the reasons we've kept that processor instead of upgrading.

Guess all this makes me a two-channel wannabe....?

Tj
 
S

Sunnyboy 1956

Guest
Strictly 2 channel

Do have a pretty low key HT system in my bedroom. At best its used once a month to watch a movie. Have a dedicated listening room for my 2 channel with NO intention of converting it to HT. I guess its 100% 2 channel for me.
Cheers :D
 

JonFo

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
50
Location
Big Canoe, GA
Multi 100% of the time thanks to Meridian Trifield processing. Never, ever listen to CD's in stereo only thanks to the superior soundstage of Trifield.
 

twich54

Forum Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
6,589
Reaction score
22
Location
SE Pa
Jeff Zaret said:
I may be the odd man out here but for me it is 80 - 85% 2 ch versus HT.

Jeff :D
Jeff, us "ole farts" need to stick together, I'm with you. Besides what alot of people see as "HT" is viewing a TV ????? Last time I went to a theatre the image was "projected" from behind me. For the theatre experience I believe a projector is the way to go.
 

JONERVI

Active member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Location
The DMV
75% 2 channel
15% Home Theater*
10% Multi Channel DVD's (Eric Clapton...One More Car One More Rider....do yourself a favor and listen)

*Because of the unique ML sound I now listen to most DVD's in 2 channel as well.
 

MotorToad

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
412
Reaction score
0
Location
St. Joe, CA
I much prefer 2 channel to surround systems. I enjoy movies in stereo, but I find when I'm listening to a surround system I'm constantly reminded that it's engineered into surround, not recorded in surround. The main thing I love about high-end audio is the clarity and accuracy, exactly the opposite of what they provide for surround. I hate to hear how the sound is introduced when whatever is making the sound is shown on the screen. "WHAT? You didn't hear that freaking HERD OF DINOSAURS until you looked that direction? %$#^&!" It was neat the first time I heard an airplane fly by in Dolby, but it didn't take long to realize that it didn't sound like what an airplane flying by sounds like.

Right now I have a crappy but free DVD player/surround system/frappe maker/enterainment thing for the TV, but I'm running it with just the center speaker and some decent front channel speakers replacing the disgusting little things that came in the box. The surround speakers were plugged up, run to the back of the room, stuffed behind the sofa, listened to, unplugged, and stuffed into the cabinet with the front speakers. :)

The funny thing is, when I bought my amp (NAD 2100), the main reason I purchased it was to be a rear channel amp and I was going to get a bigger amp for the front speakers when I bought a surround processor. One of the things I liked about it was that it had input gain for each side so I'd be able to balance the simple systems that were available back then. Yes, it was way before there were surround receivers! :)
 
Last edited:
Top