Tubes.....small vs BIG

MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum

Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.


Active member
Feb 17, 2005
Reaction score
Had a Mapleshade catalog sent to me and within its pages someone there re-habs old sixties Scott and Heathkit small tube amps and pre-amps touting their special sound.Need to hear from you tube peopleas to the virtures of the small vs the big tubes. Is there a difference and what refurbised tube amp/pre-amps would be a good match for my ML.

Bob J
Tough question to nail down for you.
Scott, in it's day was considered good equipment not off the wall great but a good value and a good product. As for HeathKit, I do not remember them being considered high end but more of an affordable option for kit builders and at that time so was Hafler and others which is not to say they were bad at all. Having said that line of conconformist crap, if it is possible, see if you can make arrangements with a local dealer to demo some tube equipment for the week or just a weekend. Personally, I think for the biggest "bang" improvement I would try a tube preamp first and see if you like the sound. After that then it is small steps. I would say tube equipment has the largest amount of variance with respect to sound versus solid state but then again I may get shot for that statement too :rolleyes:

You may find that it is not that great of an improvement and prefer to stay with solidstate (SS) which is fine. Tubes can get quite expensive and that may too be prohibitive.

As Roberto always says, and we all steal from him, "trust your ears"