Passive Preamps?

MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum

Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dreamer

Classified Forum Moderator
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Location
Washington, NC
I was messing around with my system this evening, getting it ready for a visit from a local Martin Logan guy Saturday afternoon, and after listening for a while, I decided to make a major change, just to see what it sounded like.

I had a pure passive selector (which I hand-built about 10 years ago) sitting in the back room, so I got it out on the main rack, and unplugged my CD player and amp from the C-4000t, and routed them through my little passive box instead. When I say passive, I REALLY mean it--it is a 3-position switch (for selecting source) and a stereo pot for controlling volume (both were Mil-Spec parts I got from a DC-area electronics supply house that specialises in selling parts to companies who do prototypes for the Defense Dept.), silver soldered to a bank of RCA jacks, in a Radio Shack project box. This thing is REALLY basic, and except for the REALLY cool face-plate I made for it, pretty ghetto in construction...

Anyway, I put on Diana Krall's "Girl In The Other Room", and OMG! It was like someone pulled a blanket off my Sequels. The low-level midrange noise was gone--still points in the music have a whole other level of "blackness" to them, ambience is just a lot more airy. Wow. It actually sort of ****ed me off at first, because I dropped several hundred $$$ on this Carver last fall (it was a life-long piece of "dream gear" that I just HAD to have).

Don't get me wrong--I LOVE my C-4000t. It is very versatile, and gives me all sorts of control and processing options, especially for vinyl. But let's not kid ourselves folks--the C-4000t IS a pretty noisy preamp as high-end preamps go.

And this little passive box isn't perfect either. The bass is a little too forward and even in some places exagerated, and mids are VERY laid back (but delightfully clear and well-defined) It is a VERY clean-sounding little box, but it does have a sort of laid-back pace to it on agressive music like the Doors, or something like Jet or the Donnas. It's a great piece of kit for Acoustic and Jazz, but I'll admit for rock or BIG classical it's a little too relaxed-sounding for me.

What's so amazing to me is that this little passive box cost me all of about $60 to build. The most expensive part was the Pot, and I think I paid about $35 for it back then, because I was working as a contractor and my ID allowed me to get the piece at wholesale...

If only the C-4000t was as quiet as this little box. With it's excellent phono stages, tone controls, and sound-processing, the C-4000t would be a STELLAR pre if it was this quiet...

I suppose I'm going to have to get REAL serious about tracking down a Sunfire TGP-III or IV. I've heard they are exponentially more quiet, AND they have the added advantage of doing the Sonic Holography in the digital domain, so it's much quieter and has a LOT more air too.

Call me a tweeker. I'll admit that I do, in fact, own three soldering irons. But the only time I use them is when I'm building my own stuff...

Maybe it's time to try my hand at this again. I'm thinking Vishay pots and switches all around, gold-plated jacks, and a heavily shielded metal chassis for even MORE quiet and pure signal transfer. Screw the preamplification. I'll get an outboard Phono preamp, and an outboard Sonic Holography box for when I want to "play"... Even if I put a tubed buffer stage in the mix, it would be HUNDREDS of $$$ less than even a used TGP-IV!

Anyone else use a passive (or semi-passive, like Mccormack) Preamp/Selector with their Maritn Logans?

--Richard
 
There are plenty of folks who swear by the K.I.S.S. theory, and have eliminated extraneous components (i.e. pre-amp) in the audio chain. I tried that myself for a while (feeding my Squeezebox/Benchmark direct to amp), and it definitely sounded CLEANER, but not necessarily more MUSICAL. For a while I just used a Niles AXP-1 rotary switch, for source selection. Ultimately, I found the Modwright SWL9.0SE gave me the best of everything- component switching, home heater bypass, super quiet, and just a "smidgeon" of tube warmth. It really depends on overall system synergy. Some systems NEED a pre-amp stage (whether it be SS or tube), some don't. That's the fun part of this hobby... every tweak might yield a sonic surprise!
 

Attachments

  • Niles AXP-1.jpg
    Niles AXP-1.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 222
Last edited:
Keep listening - like a lot of things with this hobby, there may be good and bad. You have been blown over by the improvements, but make sure it is not to the detriment of anything - such as bass control or bandwidth! Of course, it may be to the detriment of these things, but still "better" - that is for you to decide!
 
OK, here are the long-awaited pics of my "GPP" (Ghetto Passive Preamp)...

Perhaps not the finest craftsmanship in the business, but it DOES sound pretty sweet, and it cost less than $60 to build...

--Richard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Pic: From the front, on top of the C-4000t

Second pic: From the top

Third pic: insides--Nothing but straigh wire connections and silver solder...
 

Attachments

  • PassivePre-01.jpg
    PassivePre-01.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 202
  • PassivePre-02.jpg
    PassivePre-02.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 253
  • PassivePre-03.jpg
    PassivePre-03.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 256
You know, I just realized, maybe this thread should be moved to the DIY section...

--Richard
 
...
Anyone else use a passive (or semi-passive, like Mccormack) Preamp/Selector with their Maritn Logans?
...
Sure. What else would I be using? ;) The current one is fancy in that it uses a laser trimmed ALPS pot, relays for the source input switching, and has HT pass thru, a pretty case with blue LEDs, and a remote. But other than that, and of course in price, it is not really different from your Ghettanuator.

Since I have never had anything but passives in my ML system (the Yammy receiver does not count), I cannot comment on the diffs regarding actives and passives. I did notice a lack of dynamics when the volume was turned up with rock music while I had Aeon-is. However, I have no such complaints with the Vantages' Xstat panel.

And with passives the magic even works at low volumes, which is important for apartment dwellers like myself.

Regarding the more laid back mids and more forward bass of the passive, is this because the Carver reveals more sonic truth... or the passive? I don't think there is a real answer to this question as it all comes down to system synergy and personal preferences.
 
so what kind of passive are you using? Is it a home-made box, or a commercially-produced unit? From your description, it sounds very cool-looking. Do you have pics?

--Richard
 
Don't get too excited, it is not home made ;). Boring commercial. I posted
4 photos on AudioCircle.

Photos don't do it justice. The remote provides the most usable digital volume control I've ever used, very precise and predictable.
 
Back
Top