Electromotion ESL vs. Several Others

[davidbeinct]

I am a former Acoustat 1+1 owner looking to get away from my box speakers (Signet 280). They are pretty nice but I really would like to get more openness and imaging.

I am considering, in addition to the Martin Logan Electromotion ESLs, the following:

Gallo Acoustics Strada 2 plus TR-1D sub;

Magnepan 1.7;

Ohm Walso 2000.

I realize that this is a ML owner's forum, so I expect people will lean that way, but any pluses or minuses of these other speakers would be nice to hear. I am able to audition all but the Ohm.

 

[Gordon Gray]

I've been very impressed by the Gallo spheres with sub at the RMAF.

Same for Emerald Physics. RUR (Ken's) new reference.

Merlin Audio, which can be a bit "bright" depending on set up and gear, is also a company I would consider.

The KEF Anniversary LS50's have received fabulous reviews (by the press and users on the WBF site) and purportedly performs well above its $1,500 asking price.

Then there's the Evolution Acoustics Micro MM1. Was $1,500 but I know that the price has been increased.

GG

PS: The last two will likely need subwoof support to get full range capabilities.

 

[beanbag]

Martin Logan ESL speakers need special attention to handle all the sound they spray out the back. It can easily mess up "imaging".

 

[Gordon Gray]

He previously owned the Acoustat 1 + 1.

FYI, that is also an electrostatic with a similar design that produces sound on the "back" side of the speaker or, in your words, spray. Just like ML stats. I owned the 1 + 1's numerous years ago.

Based on this, I trust he is aware of the relevant issues regarding placement and maximizing performance, including imaging.

GG

 

[edwinr]

Martin Logan ESL speakers need special attention to handle all the sound they spray out the back. It can easily mess up "imaging".

Not if you go for the EFX