Search results

MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum

Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
  1. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Summit Upgrade Completed 1) Descent no longer needed - bass is very strong and very well integrated 2) Moved the speakers out further from back wall...excellent results, thanks for the help. 3) Sounds Great!
  2. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Thanks; I think a pair of the Summits in silver and black would complete the look...
  3. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Yeah, pretty much all high end pre-amps have the purist approach, which means that no alteration of the signal is allowed. It seems that approach overall works very well, as the sound that results is unquestionably excellent and pure. However, I have known many people with more normal type...
  4. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Placement Yeah, you are all absolutely correct. My weakest link in my system is the room. The room is quite small, and as a result, my speaker placement is less than ideal. As a result, bass response of lower frequencies is very difficult to reproduce, and often times the speakers sound too...
  5. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    One more picture Also, as you can see, I have a pair of Krell Modulari Primos. These sound very different....still assessing these...I switch on and off between the MLs and these, depending on my mood.
  6. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Pictures Thanks for the feedback. Here is a picture of the system.
  7. S

    Help! - Summits versus Ascent/Descent

    Hello, I have owned MLs for years. My current system is a complete Krell Evolution system (202 pre, 505 CD and Evo One Mono Blocks). My speakers are Ascents with a Descent Sub. I use this system only for 2 channel music listening. I am considering buying a pair of ML Summits and understand that...
Back
Top