I have been a long time Martin Logan user but have only recently joined the club. I happened to come across some threads going back a couple of years, discussing whether the Summit has a recessed midrange with some people loving the sound and others missing the claimed more forward midrange of the Prodigy and Odyssey.
There was much talk about the breakin period of the summits and also the correct postioning in the room. Some people felt there was more improvement to come on both these fronts.
I am now wondering what the overall consensus is now that the Summit has now been out for some time.
Do people feel they eventually got the sound to their liking, do they still miss the old sound, and did some trade in the Summit and go back to the older ML line.
It would interest me to hear of your experience now that the Summit's are no longer that new.
I personally love my Summit's now that they are reasonably broken in but they do have a very different sound than the older models.
There was much talk about the breakin period of the summits and also the correct postioning in the room. Some people felt there was more improvement to come on both these fronts.
I am now wondering what the overall consensus is now that the Summit has now been out for some time.
Do people feel they eventually got the sound to their liking, do they still miss the old sound, and did some trade in the Summit and go back to the older ML line.
It would interest me to hear of your experience now that the Summit's are no longer that new.
I personally love my Summit's now that they are reasonably broken in but they do have a very different sound than the older models.