Which One???

[tesseractML]

I have a good problem to have. I am considering one of these three, but am struggling with choosing. I have recently become fortunate enough to be able to have this problem. What are your experiences/thoughts on these amps?

- My dream amp for almost 10 years now is the Sanders Sound Magtech.

- The Anthem Statement P2 is just a BEAST and the design has been chugging on for roughly 20 years.

- The Anthem STR has a killer graphic control display and more power, up to a point, than the P2, even though it weighs 15 lbs. less, which does bother me. I am aware of the 2 ohm/3 sec. stipulation.


Statement P2 specs:

 

[JonFo]

- My dream amp for almost 10 years now is the Sanders Sound Magtech.

This is the one for ESLs.

I've had mine for 10 years, and I love it. It can drive the naked Monolith panel (through the step-up xformer), which is a tough load.

Would not replace it for anything else.

 

[Steelhead]

Your money so your decision.

For me, no hesitation, the Sanders magtech in a NY minute.

Have Fun!!!!!!!!!!

 

[twich54]

Sanders vote here as well ......

 

[Tmort]

I’m confused, on the sanders website their ESL mark 2 amp is for ESL’s, the magtech amp is designed to drive conventional magnetic speakers, not ESL’s.

 

[tesseractML]

Unfortunately, the Magtechs are now off the table.

I am down to the P2 or the STR. I am leaning toward the P2 because it doesn't choke at 2 ohms.

Which amp would you get to power your ESLs?

 

[Tmort]

What are you powering?
I’m using the anthem MCA 225 II, it’s a 225/400/600 w amp with my classic 9’s so it’s pushing the panels and the bass sections both and it does a wonderful job. Anthem is associated with ML, I don’t think you can go wrong with their gear and ML’s.

 

[audioxcel]

I have a good problem to have. I am considering one of these three, but am struggling with choosing. I have recently become fortunate enough to be able to have this problem. What are your experiences/thoughts on these amps?

- My dream amp for almost 10 years now is the Sanders Sound Magtech.

- The Anthem Statement P2 is just a BEAST and the design has been chugging on for roughly 20 years.

- The Anthem STR has a killer graphic control display and more power, up to a point, than the P2, even though it weighs 15 lbs. less, which does bother me. I am aware of the 2 ohm/3 sec. stipulation.


Statement P2 specs:

I have read these questions for years and all I can say is that I think people stress way too much about the HF impedance dips. I have original Sequels that I bought new a few months after they first were on the market. I am on my 3rd set of panels and second set of woofers since 1987.

At first I to stressed over the what amp to choose based on speaker impedance. My first amp was a Tandberg 3012 integrated amp. Tandberg 3012 Integrated Amplifier Review price specs - Hi-Fi Classic
It worked and sounded fine and I never had a problem with it.

Then, I upgraded to a Tandberg TPA-3016A amp and TCA 3018A preamp. I gained in the bass tightness / slam and some HF life / sparkle. Tandberg TPA-3016A and TCA-3018A Preamplifier and Power amplifier Review price specs - Hi-Fi Classic

Next I decided to try some tube gear. bought a CAT SL1 Reference preamp and liked the improvement over the Tandberg preamp (no surprise here). Both are good but the CAT is great. So, I bought a used ARC Classic-60 figuring if it couldn't drive my Sequels I would resell it. It sounded really good especially with KT-88s. I used it for the next 20 years.

Along the way I tried a Levinson No. 23,5. It bested the Classic 60 with 6550s in the deep bass but was only marginally better when I switched to KT-88s. https://www.stereophile.com/content/mark-levinson-no235-power-amplifier-page-3

The Classic-60 was simply more "there"; so sold the Levinson. The Classic-60 eventually failed catastrophically probably due to not being properly maintained over the years. ARC said the filter caps were nearly dead when I sent it in for repair.

While waiting for the CL-60 to be repaired, I bought an ARC D-70 MKII and an ARC VT-100 MKII. I really liked the D-70 MKII and it is my current amp with a CAT Signature MKIII preamp. It drives the Sequels to any level I need and my system sounds quite glorious.

I also use a Mirage BPA-400 subwoofer with a Mirage LFX-1 active crossover.

Sooooo... I say, buy the amp that sounds good to you.

 

[Robert D]

I use the Aragon Titanium dual monoblock. It does great with my Prodigy speakers. They have very large panels and twin unpowered woofers to drive.

titanium — aragon

www.aragonav.com

 

[Nuri58]

I agree about the impedance dip being too much in focus like I feel that a lot of folks look at theoretical things not real-world concerns - the impedance dip is at high frequencies, therefore not drawing nearly as much power for normal material so in general not an issue for an amp or AVR of decent quality. ML is also stating that all their LS are compatible with amps 4, 6 and 8 Ohm and I trust not just to sell their speakers. So - as said in the now previous previous post- buy the amp that sounds good to you.

 

[Mirolab]

I hear many people say the Sanders is the ultimate for ESL, but how is the Magtech as an all-around amp for regular speakers? I have 3 speakers that I rotate through, one of which are my SL3's, and the others are non-ESL. Currently, my Bryston 4B-SST2 is making me pretty happy with all 3 pairs. I've always wondered how the Magtech would compare.