Quantcast

Amp suggestions for my Logans

MartinLogan Owners (MLO)

Help Support MartinLogan Owners (MLO):

D

djheinz57

Guest
I have Ascent i for LR, Theater i for Center. and a couple very good MK's for surround. While my Pioneer Elite 47 was good enough to drive my previous Aeons, it often shuts itself off during a loud scene from a film with my Ascents. I've talked myself out of a Denon 5805 to drive the whole system, and I'm leaning towards B&K Ref 200.7 (200 W per channel into 8 ohms, 375W into 4 ohms) and B&K Ref 50 for pre/pro. Magnolia stores sometimes uses the B&K in their showroom with Ascents. Are there Logan users out there who are happy with B&K (about $4500 for the two, nearly new)? For the $4000+, are there other amps,preamps I should be considering?
 
R

rynopr

Guest
I was running an AVR507 for my 4 ML surrounds and as a pre to a B&K 3220 for my Aeon i's and Theater i. I dumped them both. I don't believe they do the Logans justice. I think you need to go to another level above B&K gear. Granted my Aeoni and Theateri are now gone. However, my Butler 5150 just came this week and is now running my Frescos and Scriptis as 2 sets of stereo speakers--side and back. What a difference compared to B&K. Movie dialog is so much clearer now and I'm not even running a center at the moment. My wife even said, "What a difference...that is so much better sounding. I can tell a difference already" I really thought music listening was the biggest disappointment. Do you have to buy new?
 

twich54

Forum Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
6,603
Reaction score
28
Location
SE Pa
For the $$$ your looking to spend, yes the "new" B&K gear would be a huge improvement over your meager receiver, but I think those same dollars would get you better gear in the used market as well, ie......Audiogon, etc.

BTW, I recently auditioned the new NAD home theater amp / pre-amp and felt it represent very good value to performance ratio.
 
Top