Recent content by meltdown

MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum

Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
  1. M

    Jeff Rowland or McIntosh?

    Looked at two Mac 275 today. Brand spanking new, 3700 bucks. Dealer showed me the new price increase from Mac, everything is going up as of April 1. That 3700 may not be cut in stone. May be able to get them a bit cheaper. Even the dealer made comment that the prices are out of hand.
  2. M

    Maggies with Martin Logans?

    I tried out a pair of psb image 10s for surrounds, they seemed to fit the bill when playing movies.
  3. M

    Maggies with Martin Logans?

    A friend has the MMG C's in a HT setup with MMG's, Iam not impressed. the MMG's alone in 2 channel thats different. My maggies are taking a nap in the closet while I fiddle with the sequel 2's I picked up, so Iam not biased. These are apples and oranges here, they each have their own virtues. In...
  4. M

    Mac and Sequels

    Not being all the that audio articulate, thats what I figured. My amp ran out of gas during some of those musical extenstions. I do have another Mac amp, maybe I'll bi-amp, or just keep the volume level lower. System sounds pretty good, although a bit bright(knotty pine tonque and groove walls)...
  5. M

    Mac and Sequels

    I got it. Dreamer got me thinking about subs. I was using a sub to augment those Maggies....why, because they dont go much below 50 Hz. You see, everything from the back of the Mac funnels into a MDS4(Macs surround processor)where I had the front speakers set to small because of their range, and...
  6. M

    Another Newbie bitten here

    Thanks, EK. Its going to be fun.
  7. M

    Mac and Sequels

    AH.... You may be on to something there. I was useing a sub with the Maggies. I know for a fact that with ML's you have to run with higher watts on the meter to get about the same volume that I was experiencing with the Maggies. I hate comparing apples to oranges, and I believe thats what Iam...
  8. M

    Mac and Sequels

    Wrong choice of words, sequels are rated 200 at 6 ohms, my mistake.
  9. M

    Mac and Sequels

    Well Tube, its like this. Mac 6500 rated at 120 per into 8 ohms and 200 per into 4 ohms. Running my Maggie Mg1c's I never had a problem. Volume of speakers was loud at 20 watts, sometimes peaking higher depending on what you were listening to. With the ML's to get the same volume I would have to...
  10. M

    Mac and Sequels

    My Mac puts out 200 watts at 4 ohms. The Sequels do 200 watts at 6 ohms. Therefore if my amp peaks out on ocassion, I'am only putting around 150 watts into the ML's. Why I ask this question is because while playing Telegraph Road there was a point where the needles on the Mac were burried and I...
  11. M

    Picture thread - Your pictures of your MLs!

    Hi Pixel......are you monoblocking RB1070 or 1080's there, I cant tell. If so, how do like them? These ML's are a new animal to me, and Iam trying to ge a handle on what works for users.
  12. M

    Another Newbie bitten here

    Picked up some Sequel II's yesterday, and my Maggies are pushed off in the corners. Curious about cables through. I am running the ML's with a Mac at the moment, they sound quite well in fact, but was wondering if these are cable specific. Also should I consider biwiring as another avenue.
Back
Top