Yes. It is a much worse option, actually. Bass traps are designed to absorb heavily in the bass region, but the absorption falls off greatly above about 500 hz. Some (I'm not sure about the GIK) are even reflective in the higher frequencies due to their design. The ML panels' rear wave has a frequency range from about 250 hz. on up to 20,000 hz. So if you are just absorbing from 250 hz. to 500 hz., then you are not doing anything to tame the reflections from 1000 hz. to 20,000 hz, which will result in a muddying of your soundstage and imaging.
Bass traps have their place in the home theater (basically in every corner you can fit them in). But they are not properly designed to dampen the rear wave of an electrostatic panel adequately. For that task, you need a panel that is designed to absorb relatively evenly throughout the entire audible frequency band.
Thats a hugely helpful response, Rich. And so simple, it makes complete sense. Based on your advice, I will put HF absorbing traps behind the MLs. And bass traps in the corners and above the TV screen.
One good response merits another so here is the output of some quick monday morning research...
Question: Will the RealTrap Mini HF, or the GIK acoustic panel or the GIK bass Trap panel provide the most linear absorption from 250 Hz to 20 kHz?
Results: Attached below is a link showing:
a) Performance of the RT HF panel (
http://www.realtraps.com/pdata.htm). Data shown is upto 10kHz
b) Performance of the GIK acoustic panel and Bass trap (
http://www.gikacoustics.com/absorption.html). data shown is only upto 5kHz
c) Performance of the GIK Bass trap, with data shown till 10kHz(
http://www.gikacoustics.com/docs/A06_016_060118_A.pdf)
With the caveat that the data are from different sources, but self reported by both the companies, some conclusions (all for
on the wall installamtion):
a) RealTraps Mini Traps HF provides,
by far, the more linear absorption from 250 Hz to 10k Hz than any other RealTraps or the GIK panel
b) GIK Bass Trap is actually better for both Bass trapping and High Frequency trapping than the GIK acoustic panel. So if you want to go GIK, go GIK Bass Trap
c) The absolute high frequency absorption above 1k HZ of the RT HF is 50-100% better than the GIK.
d) The low frequency absorption (from 100-250 hz) of the GIK Bass trap is better than the RT mondo or mini on the wall (8-16 Sabins versus 6-15 Sabins versus 1.5-12 Sabins respectively)
e) The ultra low frequency absorption (from 50-100 Hz) of GIK Bass trap is largely the same as the RT mondo and better than the RT mini (1.5-8 Sabins versus 2-6 Sabins versus 0.2-5 Sabins respectively)
The GIK monster bass trap is freported (without data) to be 3x better from 50-100 Hz
Therefore, the implications for ML owners:
1. By far the best option is to put RT Mini HF behing the ML Summits even through they are 3-4 times the price
2. Putting lower cost GIK Bass or Monster Bass panels elsewhere in the room will provide largely the same Bass trapping as the Real Traps Mondo
Thats what Im going to do...
Thanks Rich, and others. Hope my data reading is accurate and helpful to others
adanny