
Originally Posted by
JonFo
Making sure it’s not a room issue is indeed the first thing to check, however, if the driver is the same Eminence used in the Monolith's, then it is suspect at the very least due to age alone.
My dedicated room was designed around my Monoliths (and other ML’s), and I spent months tweaking placement, crossovers, etc. and finally realized that it was the darn drivers.
And no, it doesn’t have to sound horrible to be in need of replacement. What happens is the compliance of the surround changes over time and affects the distortion characteristics. Not to the point of where you would immediately notice, but significant enough to be bothersome.
The real proof is that as soon as you update the driver, the ‘tightening’ of the bass and mid-bass is so noticeable, you wonder why it was not obvious before that’s where the problem was.
Of course, room issues typically cause most FR and quality issues, and those in turn can mask an issue with a driver. But as noted, a 13 year old 12” driver should at least be inspected and validated.
Here’s one way to help validate:
Disconnect the jumpers to the panels on the binding posts and power only the bass sections of the Quest, use music and test tones to evaluate positioning and potential driver issues.
Steady test tones in the 80 to 140Hz will clearly reveal issues with a weak compliance in a woofer, and will be noticeable in ‘flabby’ (I.e. lot’s of harmonics) mid-bass.
Also, driver technology has moved forward a good bit in the past 15 years, and some of the better units out there are substantially superior to what was available in the late 80’s. The challenge is to find a good match for the exiting enclosure and crossover. Doing your own active crossover eliminates that variable and gives you more control. Although I agree, that’s not an option many of you would pursue.