camflan
Active member
Second worst thing on the fantastic EM ESL are the spikes, first being the binding "posts". Anyone upgraded these with some proper, adjustable spikes? These speakers are too good to have these cheap posts and spikes.
In some recent issues of the audio magazine, ‘Hi Fi News’ [ref 1], Keith Howard used an accelerometer to measure the levels of vibration in various objects. When he tried measuring the vibrations produced in a loudspeaker stand by playing the speaker he found a result that surprised him. With the speaker unit sitting on cones the level of vibration of the stand was over one hundred times greater than if the cones were replaced with small rubbery feet. This indicates that cones are of doubtful use if the intention is to stop vibrations passing from the speaker to the stand, or to any other solid objects against which the speaker may sit.
From my experience, your comments are baseless except for the impact room treatments may make on a system's sound.
If you want to spout off, you better back it up with some concrete facts. Otherwise, STFU.
With all due respect, it's only a forum.
You might want to read this.
http://www.audioholics.com/educatio...ker-spikes-and-cones-2013-what2019s-the-point
Basically spikes just keep the speaker from moving around on carpet or whatever. For our ESL's it can help adjust the rake too. I doubt upgrading the spikes will change the sound unless the current spikes can't penetrate your carpet effectively. Room treatments such as absorption or diffusion would be more worthy of investing IMO.
BTW Maple Shade are just a bunch of snake oil salesmen.
The real difficulty with trying to deal with vibration and acoustics to ‘improve’ a domestic audio system is that the circumstances vary a great deal from one system and room to another, and the preferences of the user also varies. My own experience is that the choice of loudspeakers, their location, and the listening position generally have a larger effect upon the sound quality than the use of spikes, etc. In some cases cones or spikes may be desired to give a better ‘grip’. In other cases some damping or isolation may be desired, so soft inelastic materials may be preferred. Hence when it comes to loudspeakers and stands, any specific recommendation may be fine in some cases, and poor in others. The best bet is therefore simply to experiment. I hope the above gives some food for thought if you are interested in doing so!
Tch,
This is in reponse to both this and your later post. Spikes and other footer devices(depending on the floor) do more than "keep the speaker from moving around". They have been proven to be beneficial to the sound. Pierre at Mapleshade has some very different ideas about speaker coupling/decoupling but they seem to be valid for his applications (small speakers placed on the floor). I have found that his prices are generally fair. I have done many comparisons on finished and raw products and his prices tend to be reasonable (given this "hobby"). Take his maple platforms, for instance, I have done a bit of research to see if his prices were fair. They are. Did I agree that placing his platforms under my Logan and/or Magnepan speakers was a good idea? No. His brass footers are expensive but when you price the cost of brass and include the milling, they are reasonable. I am still debating using them under my speakers, but I have other priorities. I don't agree with his cabling philosophy but is isn't much weirder than many other companies. He found something that works for his ears and his many customers.
As far as http://www.audioholics.com/education...019s-the-point is concerned, perhaps you should read the article carefully. From the same article:
One size doesn't fit all.
If you feel the need to not visit us again, I wouldn't object given the tone and nature of your tirade.
If you feel the need to not visit us again, I wouldn't object given the tone and nature of your tirade.
Hi all,
First off , I want to apologize to Tch and other forum members for my aggressive tone. It was inappropriate and indefensible.
Second, I will be the first to admit that Mapleshade's marketing is clearly on the cheesy side.
Back on topic.
Given the fact that Tch apparently has not heard any of the MS products in his system, and I assume anyone else's system, how can Tch make informed representations regarding the product?
In truth and absent the fact that I have tried numerous MS products (including his speaker wire, interconnects, power strip, power cords, brass cones, and CD treatment), what I find incredulous is how one can have an opinion on any audio product without trying it?
A recent example was a thread that I unfortunately participated in regarding the Marigo mat. At least half of the posts were made by individuals that, by their own admission, had never listened to the device. And, of course, they stated that those who did try it, and found it beneficial, were crazy, delusional, etc.
Please hang here Tch but consider the following. Provide input on audio products that you have personally auditioned so that it can be an informed opinion and not pure speculation. Don't attack or otherwise make disparaging remarks about a manufacturer's products unless you have a rational, defensible basis for doing so.
GG
Enter your email address to join: